Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II 2017 76 • VG SZ II 2017 76 Generato dall'IA

Denial of Coverage for Foreign-Performed Phalloplasty Under Mandatory Health Insurance

Numero d'incarto II 2017 76
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerned the denial of coverage for a phalloplasty performed abroad under a mandatory health insurance plan, where the appellant sought reimbursement for costs incurred following a gender affirmation procedure. The court reasoned that the treatment, even if medically necessary for the appellant's condition, was elective surgery primarily for aesthetic or non-essential reasons in the context of mandatory basic health insurance coverage, and therefore, the insurer was not obligated to cover the expenses for the procedure performed in a foreign country.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Denial of Coverage for Foreign-Performed Phalloplasty Under Mandatory Health Insurance: The court reasoned that the treatment, even if medically necessary for the appellant's condition, was elective surgery primarily for aesthetic or non-essential reasons in the context of mandatory basic health insurance coverage, and therefore, the insurer was not obligated to cover the expenses for the procedure performed in a foreign country.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione obbligatoria delle cure assicuratore estero rimborso dell'assicurazione malattie rimborso delle cure oncologiche cambiamento di genere prestazione d'assicurazione indebita
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2017 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenpflegeversicherung (Kostenübernahme für im Ausland erbrachte Leistung [Phalloplastik]) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: