Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2017 42 • VG SZ II 2017 42 Generato dall'IA

Company v. Local Council: Benefit Levy Appeal

Numero d'incarto II 2017 42
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a local council's decision regarding a benefit levy, which appears to concern property or development benefits derived from municipal action. The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the excerpt, focused on the legal basis and application of the benefit levy statute to the specific facts presented by the appellant against the district council's prior ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Company v. Local Council: Benefit Levy Appeal: The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the excerpt, focused on the legal basis and application of the benefit levy statute to the specific facts presented by the appellant against the district council's prior ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
vantaggio particolare per contributo di miglioria tassa ecologica prestazione statutaria incentivazione immobiliare imposta locale società anonima Vorteilsabgabe gemäss § 58 StrG | Andere öffentliche Abgaben

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to decide on the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
II 2024 11
Construction Company Benefit Levy Challenge
II 2022 61
Appeal Against Municipal Levy on Industrial Hall Connection
III 2021 85
Company v. District Council: Enforcement of Repayment Ruling
II 2019 96
Company v. Civil Engineering Office Regarding Benefit Levy for Reconstruction
III 2019 101
Corporation v. District Council Contract Award Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to decide on the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2017 42 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. September 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Vorteilsabgabe nach