Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2017 32 • VG SZ II 2017 32 Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefit Reimbursement Appeal and Waiver Denial

Numero d'incarto II 2017 32
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought reimbursement of unemployment benefits due to a suspension of benefits following an administrative decision, appealing the decision which upheld the reimbursement obligation and rejected a request for a waiver. The court reasoned that the appellant, having received benefits for which they were not entitled because they failed to report essential changes in their situation as required by law, was obliged to repay the excess funds, and the circumstances did not warrant a waiver of repayment as the administrative error was not solely attributable to the authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Unemployment Benefit Reimbursement Appeal and Waiver Denial: The court reasoned that the appellant, having received benefits for which they were not entitled because they failed to report essential changes in their situation as required by law, was obliged to repay the excess funds, and the circumstances did not warrant a waiver of repayment as the administrative error was not solely attributable to the authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
restituzione delle indennità di disoccupazione sospensione delle prestazioni obbligo di restituzione rinuncia a pretese di salario disoccupazione errore amministrativo
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 102
Unemployment Insurance Eligibility Appeal
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2023 66
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment
II 2021 67
Appeal Regarding Remittance of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Repayment Demand

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2017 32 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. August 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Markus Jakob, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Rückforderung Arbeitslosengelder, Erlass) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: