Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2017 110 • VG SZ II 2017 110 Generato dall'IA

Denial of Unemployment Benefits for Failure to Diligently Seek Employment

Numero d'incarto II 2017 110
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant contested a decision by the Office for Labor denying the entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits, stemming from a finding that the appellant had failed to fulfill their obligation to diligently seek suitable replacement employment after their previous employment ended. The court reasoned that the administrative authority was justified in concluding that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence of active job seeking efforts as required by law, and thus upheld the decision to deny benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Denial of Unemployment Benefits for Failure to Diligently Seek Employment: The court reasoned that the administrative authority was justified in concluding that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence of active job seeking efforts as required by law, and thus upheld the decision to deny benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione contro la disoccupazione disoccupazione obbligo di cercare lavoro perdita dell'impiego causata sospensione del diritto all'indennità cessazione dell'attività lucrativa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was explicitly applied in the final order.
Generato dall'IA
II 2021 77
Denial of Unemployment Benefits for Insufficient Job Search
II 2021 58
Unemployment Benefits Discontinuation for Insufficient Job Seeking
II 2023 93
Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2022 20
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Apply for Job
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was explicitly applied in the final order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2017 110 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. März 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosenentschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: