Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2016 76 • VG SZ II 2016 76 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver

Numero d'incarto II 2016 76
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision concerning supplementary benefits, specifically challenging the requirement to waive assets as a condition for receipt. The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, the applicant must demonstrate that they have exhausted all legal avenues to support themselves, which includes the obligation to liquidate or utilize legally available assets for support, thereby affirming the previous authority's decision regarding the necessity of asset waiver.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver: The court reasoned that for supplementary benefits to be granted, the applicant must demonstrate that they have exhausted all legal avenues to support themselves, which includes the obligation to liquidate or utilize legally available assets for support, thereby affirming the previous authority's decision regarding the necessity of asset waiver.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari rinuncia alle prestazioni d'assicurazione sostanza diritto all'indennità di disoccupazione soppressione della rendita d'invalidità beneficiario di prestazioni assistenziali Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2018 24
Claimant v. Administrative Body re: Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2019 75
Claimant v. Benefits Agency on Asset Relinquishment for Supplementary Benefits

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2016 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Januar 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Svetlana Vasic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Rainer Deecke, \n Industriestrasse 13c, Postfach 7555, 6302 Zug, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: