Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II 2016 101 • VG SZ II 2016 101 Generato dall'IA

Social Security Contribution Reduction Appeal: Income Assessment Upheld

Numero d'incarto II 2016 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision by a compensation fund concerning the partial reduction of social security contributions, where the core dispute involved the assessment of the appellant's income for the relevant period. The court upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that the documented income, which was used as the basis for the contribution calculation, was correctly determined according to statutory provisions and that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims of a lower actual income.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Social Security Contribution Reduction Appeal: Income Assessment Upheld: The court upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that the documented income, which was used as the basis for the contribution calculation, was correctly determined according to statutory provisions and that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims of a lower actual income.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contributi di sicurezza sociale determinazione del reddito diminuzione del reddito credito di contributi decisione sulla contribuzione base legale Prämienverbilligung | java.util.HashMap/1797211028
Generato dall'IA
II 2022 75
Social Security Contribution Calculation Appeal
II 2020 94
Social Security Contribution Assessment for Non-Gainfully Employed Status Upheld
II 2019 67
Appeal of Social Security Premium Reduction Calculation
II 2020 53
Social Security Contribution Calculation Dispute
II 2020 115
Social Security Contributions Assessment Overturned in Part for Self-Employed Couple

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2016 101 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Februar 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Prämienverbilligung |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: