Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2024 55 • VG SZ I 2024 55 Generato dall'IA

Insurance Coverage Dispute: Competitive Skiing Injury and Policy Exclusion

Numero d'incarto I 2024 55
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought a declaration of insurance coverage for an accident, claiming injury sustained while participating in a competitive skiing event, which the initial decision denied because the activity was deemed inherently dangerous, thus falling under an exclusion clause for high-risk sports. The court reviewed whether the specific nature and conditions of the event negated the application of the exclusion, reasoning that although competitive skiing is inherently risky, the specific circumstances of the appellant's injury did not exclusively arise from the exceptional danger contemplated by the policy exclusion, leading to the partial overturn of the prior ruling regarding the initial claim's validity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Coverage Dispute: Competitive Skiing Injury and Policy Exclusion: The court reviewed whether the specific nature and conditions of the event negated the application of the exclusion, reasoning that although competitive skiing is inherently risky, the specific circumstances of the appellant's injury did not exclusively arise from the exceptional danger contemplated by the policy exclusion, leading to the partial overturn of the prior ruling regarding the initial claim's validity.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
copertura dell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni riserva d'assicurazione contratto di assicurazione azione parziale vertenza di assicurazione sociale azione diretta contro l'assicuratore
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2024 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungsanspruch; 2. Rechtsgang \n im Verfahren I 2023 1) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: