Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2023 9 • VG SZ I 2023 9 Generato dall'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal: Denial of Assistance Allowance Based on Insufficient Evidence of Ongoing Need

Numero d'incarto I 2023 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant, insured under disability insurance, appealed a decision regarding the denial of an assistance allowance, arguing that the lower court incorrectly assessed the need for assistance following a spinal cord injury that resulted in significant physical limitations and dependence on others for daily activities. The court reasoned that the prior assessment of the need for assistance was based on the claimant's condition at a specific time, and although the claimant's permanent physical deficits were severe, the entitlement to an assistance allowance requires ongoing, regular, and substantial aid in everyday activities, which the evidence presented did not conclusively establish to the degree required by law, thus upholding the denial based on the existing administrative record.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 65 BGG, Art. 64 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Disability Insurance Appeal: Denial of Assistance Allowance Based on Insufficient Evidence of Ongoing Need: The court reasoned that the prior assessment of the need for assistance was based on the claimant's condition at a specific time, and although the claimant's permanent physical deficits were severe, the entitlement to an assistance allowance requires ongoing, regular, and substantial aid in everyday activities, which the evidence presented did not conclusively establish to the degree required by law, thus upholding the denial based on the existing administrative record.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione per invalidità contributo per l'assistenza graduazione dell'invalidità valutazione delle prove lesione vertebrale nuova domanda di prestazioni d'invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the decision violates the law or is factually incorrect.

Art. 65 BGG

The appeal is subject to the general admissibility requirements of Article 65 BGG.

Art. 64 BGG

The request for the granting of legal aid is rejected as the appeal lacks sufficient prospect of success.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are awarded to the respondent because the appeal was unsuccessful.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Thomas Rentsch, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Assistenzbeitrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: