Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2022 69 • VG SZ I 2022 69 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld

Numero d'incarto I 2022 69
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the disability insurance office that denied benefits, arguing that a pre-existing condition prevented them from performing their profession as a specialized craftsman due to persistent physical limitations affecting their work capacity. The court, finding that the medical evidence did not demonstrate a significant, causally related worsening of the claimant's condition that would prevent them from performing at least half of their customary work for a sustained period, upheld the insurance office's decision to deny the disability benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld: The court, finding that the medical evidence did not demonstrate a significant, causally related worsening of the claimant's condition that would prevent them from performing at least half of their customary work for a sustained period, upheld the insurance office's decision to deny the disability benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità stato anteriore diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione capacità al lavoro termini procedura di azione in materia di assicurazioni sociali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG

The appeal was dismissed based on this provision regarding the entitlement to invalidity benefits.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Mai 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: