Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2022 4 • VG SZ I 2022 4 Generato dall'IA

Survivor's Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Contribution Period

Numero d'incarto I 2022 4
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought survivor's benefits from disability insurance following the death of their spouse, but the initial administrative review denied the claim, leading to an appeal. The court upheld the denial because the claimant failed to demonstrate that the deceased spouse had worked for the requisite minimum period under the relevant insurance scheme before the disability that ultimately led to their death, thereby not satisfying the necessary contribution requirements for awarding survivor's benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Survivor's Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Contribution Period: The court upheld the denial because the claimant failed to demonstrate that the deceased spouse had worked for the requisite minimum period under the relevant insurance scheme before the disability that ultimately led to their death, thereby not satisfying the necessary contribution requirements for awarding survivor's benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni per superstiti credito di contributi prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità decesso del coniuge durata minima di contribuzione assegno di morte Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA
II 2023 51
Social Security Survivor's Benefits Appeal
II 2021 21
Appeal of Unemployment Benefits Denial Based on Insufficient Contribution Period Despite Disability
II 2024 82
Survivor's Insurance Benefits Damages Claim Preclusion
I 2018 29
Claimant Denied Continued Disability Benefits
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 3. Juni 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: