Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2022 33 • VG SZ I 2022 33 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity

Numero d'incarto I 2022 33
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought a disability pension from the disability insurance office, which the office rejected, leading to an appeal. The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity: The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rendita d'invalidità capacità lavorativa residua accertamento della capacità lavorativa attività lucrativa godimento dei diritti civili determinazione del reddito d'invalido
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenrente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: