Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2022 20 • VG SZ I 2022 20 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial

Numero d'incarto I 2022 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant sought disability insurance benefits (a pension) following injuries sustained in a work-related traffic accident, where the initial decision and subsequent appeal both denied the claim, leading the claimant to contest the ruling regarding their degree of invalidity. The court upheld the previous decisions, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish a degree of invalidity reaching the threshold required for the requested pension under the relevant insurance legislation, thus affirming the denial of benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial: The court upheld the previous decisions, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish a degree of invalidity reaching the threshold required for the requested pension under the relevant insurance legislation, thus affirming the denial of benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione invalidità assicurazione invalidità incidente stradale vertenza di assicurazione sociale motivi medici azione diretta contro l'assicuratore Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA
I 2018 27
Claimant v. Insurance Provider: Disability Benefits Denial Affirmed
I 2017 100
Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial)
I 2018 30
Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits Due to Insufficient Impairment
I 2022 69
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld
I 2021 44
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: