Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2022 1 • VG SZ I 2022 1 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Causation Appeal: Meniscus Injury

Numero d'incarto I 2022 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal concerning accident insurance, specifically the causal link between an alleged accident and a subsequent meniscus injury, following a second appeal stage. The appellant sought to overturn a previous decision regarding the insurance claim. The court's reasoning, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, must address the evidentiary threshold required to establish that the workplace accident was the direct and proximate cause of the claimant's specific meniscus damage for the insurance benefit to be awarded.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Causation Appeal: Meniscus Injury: The appellant sought to overturn a previous decision regarding the insurance claim. The court's reasoning, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, must address the evidentiary threshold required to establish that the workplace accident was the direct and proximate cause of the claimant's specific meniscus damage for the insurance benefit to be awarded.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
causalità dell'infortunio domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione lesione del menisco assicurazione diretta nesso causale prestazioni per lesione al ginocchio
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 1 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Dr.med. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Meniskusschaden / 2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren I 2021 10) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: