Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2021 74 • VG SZ I 2021 74 Generato dall'IA

Suspension of Disability Benefits for Failure to Attend Medical Follow-up

Numero d'incarto I 2021 74
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an insured person who had been receiving a disability pension and attendance allowance, which the insurance office provisionally suspended because the required medical follow-up was not performed, leading the insured person to appeal the decision. The court reasoned that the provisional suspension of benefits due to a failure to comply with medical reporting duties is a permissible measure under the relevant social security legislation, provided that the insured was previously made aware of the obligation and the consequences of non-compliance, thereby upholding the decision to suspend the benefits until the required medical assessment is completed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Suspension of Disability Benefits for Failure to Attend Medical Follow-up: The court reasoned that the provisional suspension of benefits due to a failure to comply with medical reporting duties is a permissible measure under the relevant social security legislation, provided that the insured was previously made aware of the obligation and the consequences of non-compliance, thereby upholding the decision to suspend the benefits until the required medical assessment is completed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione delle prestazioni d'invalidità prestazione provvisorie graduazione dell'invalidità prestazioni della sicurezza sociale motivi medici rendita d'invalidità dell'assicurazione infortuni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision regulates the distribution of court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 74 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Januar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Milena Pesic, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (vorsorgliche Sistierung der IV-Rente sowie der Hilflosenentschädigung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: