Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA complainant appealed a decision regarding accident insurance benefits, disputing the causal link between an accident and a listed diagnosis for which benefits were claimed. The court, in its decision, upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that although the accident occurred, the evidence did not establish the requisite medical causality between the initial incident and the subsequent listed diagnosis to mandate the insurer's liability for the claimed benefits.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAccident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute: The court, in its decision, upheld the prior ruling, reasoning that although the accident occurred, the evidence did not establish the requisite medical causality between the initial incident and the subsequent listed diagnosis to mandate the insurer's liability for the claimed benefits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 3 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. April 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Leistungspflicht aus \n Listendiagnose