Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2021 15 • VG SZ I 2021 15 Generato dall'IA

Administrative Appeal Decision Review

Numero d'incarto I 2021 15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision regarding a claim, where the core dispute likely involved the factual or legal basis of an administrative determination made by the opposing party. The court reached its verdict by evaluating the evidence and applying relevant legal standards to the established facts, ultimately upholding or overturning the lower instance's ruling based on whether that decision correctly interpreted and applied the law to the situation presented.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Administrative Appeal Decision Review: The court reached its verdict by evaluating the evidence and applying relevant legal standards to the established facts, ultimately upholding or overturning the lower instance's ruling based on whether that decision correctly interpreted and applied the law to the situation presented.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
base fattuale revoca della decisione amministrativa sindacato giurisdizionale domanda indirizzata all'autorità decisione incidentale impugnabile sentenze interpretative Unfallversicherung (Leistungen; Unfallkausalität) | Unfallversicherung
Generato dall'IA
I 2018 91
Appeal of Administrative Claim Decision
BEK 2024 150
Appeal Regarding Judicial Authorization for Administrative Claim
III 2018 49
Appealability of Administrative Act
III 2016 9
Appeal Determination Based on Remedy Requirements
ZK2 2023 24
Appeal Regarding Claim Enforcement

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 15 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. April 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, \n 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n