Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2021 14 • VG SZ I 2021 14 Generato dall'IA

Disability Benefits Recalculation Post-Subsequent Employment Change

Numero d'incarto I 2021 14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant, appealing a decision, sought clarification regarding the calculation of disability benefits following a work-related accident, specifically challenging the refusal to adjust the assessment basis after a subsequent, unrelated change in employment and income. The court reasoned that the relevant period for determining the loss of earning capacity is the time immediately following the accident, and subsequent unrelated changes in employment or income, even if resulting in higher earnings, do not justify a recalculation of the initial disability assessment as the original decision correctly reflected the consequences of the accident at that time.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Disability Benefits Recalculation Post-Subsequent Employment Change: The court reasoned that the relevant period for determining the loss of earning capacity is the time immediately following the accident, and subsequent unrelated changes in employment or income, even if resulting in higher earnings, do not justify a recalculation of the initial disability assessment as the original decision correctly reflected the consequences of the accident at that time.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricalcolo di prestazioni d'invalidità cambiamento d'impiego perdita di lavoro determinazione del reddito valutazione della capacità lavorativa reddito da invalido
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2021 14 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. April 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsteller, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, \n 6002 Luzern, \n Gesuchsgegnerin, |\n \n\n

\n