Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2020 88 • VG SZ I 2020 88 Generato dall'IA

Denial of Disability Benefits Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence of Long-Term Impairment

Numero d'incarto I 2020 88
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant sought disability insurance benefits based on alleged health impairments, but the insurance office denied the claim, leading to an appeal. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish that the appellant suffered from a limitation of earning capacity lasting or expected to last for at least one year, which is a prerequisite for receiving disability benefits under the relevant statute, and thus the appeal had to be dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Denial of Disability Benefits Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence of Long-Term Impairment: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish that the appellant suffered from a limitation of earning capacity lasting or expected to last for at least one year, which is a prerequisite for receiving disability benefits under the relevant statute, and thus the appeal had to be dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione motivi medici assicurazione malattia termine di prescrizione peggioramento del danno alla salute Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BGG

The appeal is dismissed, and costs are imposed according to this article.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal fee is set according to this article.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 88 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. März 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: