Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2020 80 • VG SZ I 2020 80 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Fund (Invalidity Pension Appeal)

Numero d'incarto I 2020 80
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision regarding disability insurance, which had denied an invalidity pension based on the finding that the claimant was not impaired to the degree required for benefits. The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not demonstrate a significant, long-term reduction in the claimant's earning capacity in any occupation that could be reasonably expected of them, which is the necessary prerequisite for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant insurance statutes.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Fund (Invalidity Pension Appeal): The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not demonstrate a significant, long-term reduction in the claimant's earning capacity in any occupation that could be reasonably expected of them, which is the necessary prerequisite for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant insurance statutes.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rendita d'invalidità assicurazione invalidità prestazione d'assicurazione fondo pensionistico riduzione della rendita grado di invalidità Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenrente) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA
I 2018 36
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration
I 2019 15
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Decision Upheld
I 2019 71
Claimant v. Social Insurance Institution: Disability Pension Appeal
I 2024 1
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal
I 2023 11
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office (Disability Pension Appeal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 80 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Januar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenrente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: