Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2020 74 • VG SZ I 2020 74 Generato dall'IA

Disability Benefits Review Based on Alcohol Abstinence

Numero d'incarto I 2020 74
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought disability benefits, arguing their condition, related to alcohol dependence, had not improved, while the insurance authority scheduled a review of the prospective pension, conditioned on abstinence. The court found that the authority was entitled to review the pension based on the established medical facts that the appellant had not abstained from alcohol, and since continued non-abstinence was not a recognized medical cause preventing improvement, the condition for the review was met, thus upholding the decision to schedule the review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Disability Benefits Review Based on Alcohol Abstinence: The court found that the authority was entitled to review the pension based on the established medical facts that the appellant had not abstained from alcohol, and since continued non-abstinence was not a recognized medical cause preventing improvement, the condition for the review was met, thus upholding the decision to schedule the review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revisione delle prestazioni d'invalidità dipendenza da alcol riesame medico prestazioni assicurative rendita d'invalidità soppressione delle rendite di invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG

The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to prove that the challenged decision violated legal provisions (Art. 65 para. 1 lit. a ATSG is cited in the dispositive by implication as the general basis for review, though not explicitly listed as the ground for dismissal, but as the standard for appeal review, in this context it leads to the rejection of the appeal).

Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the court costs because the appeal was unsuccessful.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 74 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Künftige Rentenrevision / Alkoholabstinenz) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: