Disability Benefits Appeal Regarding Evidentiary Weight of Medical Opinion
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn individual appealed a decision by an insurance office concerning disability benefits, specifically challenging the evidentiary value of a medical opinion. The court reasoned that an expert medical opinion, even if based on established medical knowledge, is not automatically conclusive and must be evaluated by the adjudicating body based on its entire content, including whether the expert followed established procedural rules or if the findings appear contradictory or incomplete, thereby requiring further assessment or potentially being set aside if scientifically unsound or unconvincing.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IADisability Benefits Appeal Regarding Evidentiary Weight of Medical Opinion: The court reasoned that an expert medical opinion, even if based on established medical knowledge, is not automatically conclusive and must be evaluated by the adjudicating body based on its entire content, including whether the expert followed established procedural rules or if the findings appear contradictory or incomplete, thereby requiring further assessment or potentially being set aside if scientifically unsound or unconvincing.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 28 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Mai 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: