Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IATwo petitioners appealed a decision concerning accident insurance coverage for an injury deemed an accident-like bodily harm, where the core issue was whether the resulting condition qualified as an insurable accident under the relevant law. The court reasoned that for an event to constitute an accident-like bodily harm, it must involve an unforeseen, sudden, and externally induced physical impact on the body that causes harm, and since the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish a sudden, external event causing the specific impairment, the appeal against the prior decision denying coverage was ultimately dismissed.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAInsurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm: The court reasoned that for an event to constitute an accident-like bodily harm, it must involve an unforeseen, sudden, and externally induced physical impact on the body that causes harm, and since the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish a sudden, external event causing the specific impairment, the appeal against the prior decision denying coverage was ultimately dismissed.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 20 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Juli 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführer, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (unfallähnliche Körperschädigung; 2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren I 2019 20) |\n
\n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: