Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2020 104 • VG SZ I 2020 104 Generato dall'IA

Disability Pension Discontinuation Appeal Upheld

Numero d'incarto I 2020 104
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought to overturn a decision by the administrative body to discontinue their disability insurance pension, stemming from a previous finding that the appellant's degree of disability no longer met the legal threshold. The court reasoned that although the appellant reported ongoing symptoms and sought further treatment, the medical documentation did not conclusively establish that the work capacity limitation had worsened or that the previous assessment of residual capacity was erroneous, thus upholding the decision to cease the pension payments as the documented medical condition did not warrant a continued entitlement based on the existing evidence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG, Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 67 Abs. 1 BGG; Disability Pension Discontinuation Appeal Upheld: The court reasoned that although the appellant reported ongoing symptoms and sought further treatment, the medical documentation did not conclusively establish that the work capacity limitation had worsened or that the previous assessment of residual capacity was erroneous, thus upholding the decision to cease the pension payments as the documented medical condition did not warrant a continued entitlement based on the existing evidence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rendita d'invalidità revoca della rendita motivi medici cessazione delle prestazioni diritto alla rendita graduazione dell'invalidità Invalidenversicherung (Einstellung der Rente) | Invalidenversicherung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG
This provision is the basis for the dismissal of the appeal on the merits concerning the cessation of the disability pension.
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
This provision was used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision of the highest court in the canton.
Art. 67 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision was applied to decide on the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
I 2020 10
Disability Pension Cessation Upheld Despite Flawed Medical Review
I 2022 64
Claimant's Disability Pension Suspension Upheld Due to Contradictory Evidence of Capacity
I 2022 33
Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity
I 2017 43
Appeal Dismissed: Disability Insurance Benefits Cessation Upheld
I 2022 58
Pension Discontinuation Upheld After Disability Revision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BVG

This provision is the basis for the dismissal of the appeal on the merits concerning the cessation of the disability pension.

Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

This provision was used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision of the highest court in the canton.

Art. 67 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was applied to decide on the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 104 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Einstellung der Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: