Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2020 102 • VG SZ I 2020 102 Generato dall'IA

Invalidity Pension Claim Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence of Impairment

Numero d'incarto I 2020 102
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought an invalidity pension from the social insurance provider, who rejected the claim because the medical evidence did not substantiate a sustained, significant impairment of earning capacity resulting from a pre-existing condition. The court affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the medical assessment, particularly regarding the duration and severity of the health issue and its impact on work capacity, did not meet the legal threshold required for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant social insurance law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Invalidity Pension Claim Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence of Impairment: The court affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the medical assessment, particularly regarding the duration and severity of the health issue and its impact on work capacity, did not meet the legal threshold required for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant social insurance law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pensione d'invalidità valutazione della capacità lavorativa danno alla salute motivi medici assicurazione malattia indicazioni sulla salute Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal is partially granted and the decision of the IV authority is set aside to the extent that the claimant was not granted an initial assessment.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG

The respondent authority must bear the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 102 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: