Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2019 92 • VG SZ I 2019 92 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Causation Appeal (Second Instance)

Numero d'incarto I 2019 92
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal concerning accident insurance, specifically the causal link between an accident and subsequent claims, marking the second instance of appeal in the matter. The court's reasoning focused on the established legal standards for determining the necessary causal relationship in accident insurance claims, ultimately reaching a determination on the validity of the claim based on the evidence presented regarding the connection between the insured event and the claimed consequences.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Causation Appeal (Second Instance): The court's reasoning focused on the established legal standards for determining the necessary causal relationship in accident insurance claims, ultimately reaching a determination on the validity of the claim based on the evidence presented regarding the connection between the insured event and the claimed consequences.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
materia di assicurazione contro gli infortuni nesso di causalità accertato evento assicurato azione diretta contro l'assicuratore causalità dell'infortunio rapporto d'assicurazione
Generato dall'IA
I 2021 56
Accident Insurance Causation Appeal
I 2021 78
Accident Insurance Causation Dispute
I 2019 39
Accident Insurance Causality Dispute Appeal
I 2019 11
Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim
I 2018 28
Appeal on Causality in Accident Insurance Coverage

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Kausalzusammenhang; 2. Rechtsgang zu \n VGE I 2018 91 vom 10.4.2019) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: