Insurance Benefits Denial for Trip-Related Injury
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant sought accident insurance benefits for an injury sustained during a trip, claiming it was work-related, but the lower court denied the claim, finding insufficient evidence of the requisite causal link between the work activity and the accident. The court reasoned that the accident, which occurred during a leisure activity at the destination, was not sufficiently connected to the purpose of the business trip to qualify as an insured work accident under the applicable legal framework, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny benefits.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAInsurance Benefits Denial for Trip-Related Injury: The court reasoned that the accident, which occurred during a leisure activity at the destination, was not sufficiently connected to the purpose of the business trip to qualify as an insured work accident under the applicable legal framework, thus upholding the lower court's decision to deny benefits.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 8 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Juni 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Leistungen) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: