Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2019 33 • VG SZ I 2019 33 Generato dall'IA

Stay of Execution Denial Upheld in Boundary Dispute

Numero d'incarto I 2019 33
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party filed a complaint against a decision that denied their application for a stay of execution, which was sought pending a principal action concerning a dispute over property boundaries and easements, where the lower court had determined that the applicant failed to demonstrate a high likelihood of success in the main action or that irreparable harm would result from the immediate enforcement of the contested decision. The court upheld the denial of the stay, reasoning that the movant did not meet the necessary high threshold of probability for success in the principal case, nor was there sufficient evidence to establish that the continuation of the current situation pending the main litigation would cause harm that could not be adequately remedied by subsequent compensation if the movant ultimately prevailed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Stay of Execution Denial Upheld in Boundary Dispute: The court upheld the denial of the stay, reasoning that the movant did not meet the necessary high threshold of probability for success in the principal case, nor was there sufficient evidence to establish that the continuation of the current situation pending the main litigation would cause harm that could not be adequately remedied by subsequent compensation if the movant ultimately prevailed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione dell'esecuzione domanda di continuazione dell'esecuzione azione di rivendicazione nel pignoramento fondamento dell'azione decisione motivata risoluzione del conflitto giurisdizionale Invalidenversicherung (Assistenzbeitrag) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Parteien · \n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin,