Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 95 • VG SZ I 2018 95 Generato dall'IA

Asset Distribution Annulment Based on Material Error in Divorce Settlement

Numero d'incarto I 2018 95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual sued four defendants, seeking the annulment of a distribution of assets that occurred during a divorce proceeding, claiming the distribution agreement was void due to a material error regarding the value of certain assets. The court reasoned that the claim for annulment based on a material error requires the error to be so significant that, had the correct facts been known, the agreement would not have been concluded, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged error in asset valuation was sufficient to render the entire agreement void under the relevant legal standard for challenging contractual declarations based on mistake.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Asset Distribution Annulment Based on Material Error in Divorce Settlement: The court reasoned that the claim for annulment based on a material error requires the error to be so significant that, had the correct facts been known, the agreement would not have been concluded, and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged error in asset valuation was sufficient to render the entire agreement void under the relevant legal standard for challenging contractual declarations based on mistake.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
convenzione sulle conseguenze accessorie del divorzio errore manifesto valutazione degli attivi errore di fatto annullamento civile impiego illecito di valori patrimoniali
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 95 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 11. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Klägerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________ (ehemals D.________), \n2. E.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin F.________, \n3. G.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. H.________, \n4. I.________, \n Beklagte, |\n

\n\n

\n