Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 92 • VG SZ I 2018 92 Generato dall'IA

Disability Benefits Claimant v. Administrative Authority: Sufficiency of Medical Evidence and Duty to Order Expert Examination

Numero d'incarto I 2018 92
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought an assessment of their residual work capacity by a medical expert, but the lower authority denied this request, relying instead on existing medical documentation, which the appellant challenged as insufficient for a proper assessment of their claim for disability insurance benefits. The court reasoned that while the administrative body has discretion in ordering further expert examinations, this discretion is limited by the duty to adequately investigate the facts of the case, meaning that if the existing medical evidence is manifestly insufficient or contradictory regarding the claimant's capacity to work, the authority must order a new medical assessment to fulfill its obligation to establish the facts objectively.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Disability Benefits Claimant v. Administrative Authority: Sufficiency of Medical Evidence and Duty to Order Expert Examination: The court reasoned that while the administrative body has discretion in ordering further expert examinations, this discretion is limited by the duty to adequately investigate the facts of the case, meaning that if the existing medical evidence is manifestly insufficient or contradictory regarding the claimant's capacity to work, the authority must order a new medical assessment to fulfill its obligation to establish the facts objectively.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
graduazione dell'invalidità massima inquisitoria mezzi di prova medici potere di apprezzamento amministrativo motivazione sufficiente diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: