Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2018 91 • VG SZ I 2018 91 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Administrative Claim Decision

Numero d'incarto I 2018 91
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved a challenge against a prior administrative decision concerning a claim, where the appellant contested the determination made by the administrative body. The court, in reaching its verdict, focused on the interpretation and application of relevant legal provisions regarding the underlying claim, ultimately upholding the prior ruling based on the established facts and the correct legal standard applied by the lower authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Administrative Claim Decision: The court, in reaching its verdict, focused on the interpretation and application of relevant legal provisions regarding the underlying claim, ultimately upholding the prior ruling based on the established facts and the correct legal standard applied by the lower authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnazione di decisioni amministrative perenzione del diritto amministrativo ricorso del personale legittimazione a ricorrere riesame di una decisione precedente sanzione amministrativa Unfallversicherung (Rente und Integritätsentschädigung) | Unfallversicherung
Generato dall'IA
I 2021 15
Administrative Appeal Decision Review
BEK 2024 150
Appeal Regarding Judicial Authorization for Administrative Claim
III 2017 110
Appeal Against District Council Administrative Decision
ZK2 2024 51
Appeal of Estate Administration Decision
III 2018 49
Appealability of Administrative Act

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 91 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n