Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2018 77 • VG SZ I 2018 77 Generato dall'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal: Substantial Disability Finding Challenge

Numero d'incarto I 2018 77
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance, challenging the lower court's finding that they were not substantially disabled. The court reasoned that while the claimant presented medical evidence suggesting functional limitations, the overall assessment, including objective medical findings and vocational rehabilitation reports, did not definitively establish an incapacity to work that met the legal threshold for disability benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal: Substantial Disability Finding Challenge: The court reasoned that while the claimant presented medical evidence suggesting functional limitations, the overall assessment, including objective medical findings and vocational rehabilitation reports, did not definitively establish an incapacity to work that met the legal threshold for disability benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
valutazione dell'incapacità di lavoro prestazione dell'assicurazione invalidità riabilitazione professionale riscontri medici oggettivi motivi medici inchiesta professionale Invalidenversicherung | java.util.HashMap/1797211028
Generato dall'IA
I 2020 53
Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits Determination
I 2019 55
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Appeal)
I 2021 11
Appeal of Disability Insurance Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence
I 2020 18
Appeal Regarding Disability Benefits and Medical Assessment Validity
I 2017 89
Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 77 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: