Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 75 • VG SZ I 2018 75 Generato dall'IA

Occupational Injury Compensation Appeal: Residual Earning Capacity Assessment

Numero d'incarto I 2018 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision concerning a claim for compensation following an occupational injury that resulted in a permanent reduction of earning capacity, arguing that the assessment of the residual earning capacity in the initial ruling was too low. The court reasoned that the initial determination of the claimant's residual earning capacity, based on the established medical assessment of the functional deficits and the current labor market situation, was correct and that the appeal lacked sufficient grounds to warrant a revision of the established degree of disability.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Occupational Injury Compensation Appeal: Residual Earning Capacity Assessment: The court reasoned that the initial determination of the claimant's residual earning capacity, based on the established medical assessment of the functional deficits and the current labor market situation, was correct and that the appeal lacked sufficient grounds to warrant a revision of the established degree of disability.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
valutazione della capacità di guadagno graduazione dell'invalidità recupero della capacità lavorativa prestazioni dell'assicurazione infortuni indennità per perdita guadagno motivi medici
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, \n Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n