Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2018 59 • VG SZ I 2018 59 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Lump-Sum Disability Payment for Missed Appointment

Numero d'incarto I 2018 59
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding disability insurance, specifically challenging the refusal to grant a lump-sum payment related to a missed appointment. The court found that the appellant, despite a medical need for assistance during travel, had failed to ensure their presence at the scheduled appointment, which led to the denial of the payment. The court reasoned that the obligation to appear for scheduled assessments rests with the insured person, and in the absence of a valid justification for non-attendance, the administrative body was correct in refusing the lump-sum compensation for the missed appointment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Denial of Lump-Sum Disability Payment for Missed Appointment: The court found that the appellant, despite a medical need for assistance during travel, had failed to ensure their presence at the scheduled appointment, which led to the denial of the payment. The court reasoned that the obligation to appear for scheduled assessments rests with the insured person, and in the absence of a valid justification for non-attendance, the administrative body was correct in refusing the lump-sum compensation for the missed appointment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennizzo per invalidità assistenza amministrativa assicurazione viaggio motivi medici vertenza di assicurazione sociale azione di contestazione della graduatoria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 BGG
The appeal is rejected because the appellant did not provide sufficient justification for the alleged errors, as required by the procedure.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs for the federal litigation.
Generato dall'IA
I 2018 49
Appeal Regarding Denial of Attendance Allowance Entitlement
I 2019 83
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal
I 2022 61
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Over Income Calculation and Failure to Consider Prior Incapacity
I 2022 21
Claimant's Appeal of Disability Benefits Ripe for Review Denied

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 BGG

The appeal is rejected because the appellant did not provide sufficient justification for the alleged errors, as required by the procedure.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs for the federal litigation.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Invalidenversicherung (Non-Show-Pauschale /