Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 44 • VG SZ I 2018 44 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Pension Calculation and Residual Earning Capacity

Numero d'incarto I 2018 44
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An insured individual appealed a decision regarding the calculation of their accident insurance pension, which resulted from a work-related accident causing permanent disability. The court reviewed whether the previous instance correctly assessed the insured's residual earning capacity after the accident by comparing it to the hypothetical earnings in the profession they would have practiced without the injury. The court found that the assessment of residual earning capacity, based on the individual's ability to perform alternative work in a comparable professional field given their education and experience, was legally sound and did not constitute an arbitrary evaluation of the factual evidence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Pension Calculation and Residual Earning Capacity: The court reviewed whether the previous instance correctly assessed the insured's residual earning capacity after the accident by comparing it to the hypothetical earnings in the profession they would have practiced without the injury. The court found that the assessment of residual earning capacity, based on the individual's ability to perform alternative work in a comparable professional field given their education and experience, was legally sound and did not constitute an arbitrary evaluation of the factual evidence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rendita d'invalidità dell'assicurazione infortuni calcolo della rendita capacità lavorativa residua guadagno assicurato valutazione della capacità lavorativa riesame della rendita di invalidità Unfallversicherung (Rentenhöhe) | Unfallversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 44 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Rentenhöhe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: