Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 42 • VG SZ I 2018 42 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Causality of Accident Insurance Benefits

Numero d'incarto I 2018 42
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An insured individual appealed a decision concerning accident insurance benefits, specifically challenging the finding regarding the causality of their injuries. The court reviewed the case, which involved an insured event and subsequent medical assessment, ultimately upholding the lower court's determination by finding insufficient evidence to establish the requisite causal link between the accident and the claimed long-term health consequences, thereby rejecting the appeal regarding further benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Causality of Accident Insurance Benefits: The court reviewed the case, which involved an insured event and subsequent medical assessment, ultimately upholding the lower court's determination by finding insufficient evidence to establish the requisite causal link between the accident and the claimed long-term health consequences, thereby rejecting the appeal regarding further benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni dell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni evento assicurato assicurazione malattia nesso causale mezzi di prova medici estinzione delle prestazioni assicurative Unfallversicherung (Leistungen, Kausalität) | Unfallversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 42 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Juli 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungen, Kausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: