Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2018 29 • VG SZ I 2018 29 Generato dall'IA

Claimant Denied Continued Disability Benefits

Numero d'incarto I 2018 29
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance benefits, asserting they were entitled to continued benefits despite a prior ruling. The court reviewed the case and found that the claimant had not presented sufficient new evidence or demonstrated a change in their medical or professional capacity that would warrant overturning the initial assessment of their remaining earning capacity in the regular labor market. Therefore, the court upheld the prior decision denying further benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant Denied Continued Disability Benefits: The court reviewed the case and found that the claimant had not presented sufficient new evidence or demonstrated a change in their medical or professional capacity that would warrant overturning the initial assessment of their remaining earning capacity in the regular labor market. Therefore, the court upheld the prior decision denying further benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
continuazione delle prestazioni d'invalidità prestazioni assicurative valutazione della capacità di guadagno accertamento medico complementare controversia di sicurezza sociale graduazione dell'invalidità Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA
I 2023 46
Disability Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2023 49
Disability Insurance Benefit Denial Appeal
I 2020 53
Appeal Regarding Disability Insurance Benefits Determination
I 2022 21
Claimant's Appeal of Disability Benefits Ripe for Review Denied
I 2022 62
Appeal of Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 29 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: