Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 25 • VG SZ I 2018 25 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Expert Assessment Body Selection Appeal

Numero d'incarto I 2018 25
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought to appeal an intermediate decision regarding the selection of an expert assessment body for an accident insurance matter. The appellant challenged the selection made by the lower instance, which had appointed a specific medical expert. The court reasoned that the law governing accident insurance grants the administrative authority the discretion to appoint the expert assessment body, and in the absence of specific legal criteria mandating a different choice, the court could not substitute its own assessment for that of the authority, thus upholding the intermediate decision concerning the expert assessment body.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Expert Assessment Body Selection Appeal: The appellant challenged the selection made by the lower instance, which had appointed a specific medical expert. The court reasoned that the law governing accident insurance grants the administrative authority the discretion to appoint the expert assessment body, and in the absence of specific legal criteria mandating a different choice, the court could not substitute its own assessment for that of the authority, thus upholding the intermediate decision concerning the expert assessment body.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
organo dell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni scelta del perito decisioni in materia medica autorità con potere di nomina potere di apprezzamento amministrativo criteri di valutazione
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 25 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Zwischenverfügung betr. Gutachterstelle) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: