Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 24 • VG SZ I 2018 24 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Integrity Impairment Compensation Appeal Upheld

Numero d'incarto I 2018 24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision regarding accident insurance, specifically concerning the compensation for integrity impairment. The appellant sought a reassessment of the compensation awarded following an accident. The court reviewed the previous decision and the factual basis, ultimately upholding the prior determination by confirming that the assessment of the severity of the residual impairment, which formed the basis for the compensation amount, was legally sound and not factually incorrect or arbitrary under the applicable insurance regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Integrity Impairment Compensation Appeal Upheld: The appellant sought a reassessment of the compensation awarded following an accident. The court reviewed the previous decision and the factual basis, ultimately upholding the prior determination by confirming that the assessment of the severity of the residual impairment, which formed the basis for the compensation amount, was legally sound and not factually incorrect or arbitrary under the applicable insurance regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità assicurativa indennità per menomazione dell'integrità gravità dell'infortunio assicurazione invalidità azienda composita nell'assicurazione infortuni validità della cessione del credito Unfallversicherung (Integritätsentschädigung) | Unfallversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 24 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Integritätsentschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: