Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2018 23 • VG SZ I 2018 23 Generato dall'IA

Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Orthopedic Shoe Inserts

Numero d'incarto I 2018 23
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant sought coverage under disability insurance for orthopedic shoe inserts, which the administrative office initially denied. The court, reviewing the appeal concerning disability insurance benefits for orthopedic aids, reasoned that the inserts were only covered if medically necessary to treat a condition affecting the insured's physical functioning or ability to work, and found that the inserts provided were not sufficiently proven to meet the required threshold for mandatory insurance coverage as a necessary medical aid.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Coverage Dispute Over Orthopedic Shoe Inserts: The court, reviewing the appeal concerning disability insurance benefits for orthopedic aids, reasoned that the inserts were only covered if medically necessary to treat a condition affecting the insured's physical functioning or ability to work, and found that the inserts provided were not sufficiently proven to meet the required threshold for mandatory insurance coverage as a necessary medical aid.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
copertura dell'assicurazione invalidità motivi medici sovrassicurazione prestazione obbligatoria lesione al piede franchigia assicurativa
Generato dall'IA
I 2020 35
Disability Insurance Coverage for Custom Orthopedic Shoes Overturning Administrative Refusal
I 2021 17
Disability Insurance Reimbursement for Specialized Orthoses and Shoes
I 2019 21
Applicant v. Decision on Orthopedic Insoles Cost Coverage
I 2022 52
Insurance Coverage Denial for Corrective Surgery
I 2024 20
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Agency: Leg Length Discrepancy and Disability Benefits Denial Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 23 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Hilfsmittel / orthopädische Masseinlagen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: