Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2018 19 • VG SZ I 2018 19 Generato dall'IA

Disability Insurance Claimant Challenges Denial of Chosen Medical Expert

Numero d'incarto I 2018 19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance, specifically challenging the rejection of their request to have a medical expert of their choice involved in the assessment. The court reasoned that the administrative body, within its discretionary authority, is responsible for appointing medical experts necessary for determining disability claims, and there was no justification to override this procedural determination since the appointed experts were qualified and the claimant's request for a specific expert lacked sufficient grounds to warrant intervention.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG; Disability Insurance Claimant Challenges Denial of Chosen Medical Expert: The court reasoned that the administrative body, within its discretionary authority, is responsible for appointing medical experts necessary for determining disability claims, and there was no justification to override this procedural determination since the appointed experts were qualified and the claimant's request for a specific expert lacked sufficient grounds to warrant intervention.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
graduazione dell'invalidità assicurazione per invalidità motivi medici autorità con potere di nomina diritto alle prestazioni assicurative vertenza di assicurazione sociale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 des Bundesgesetzes über den Sitz in der Schweiz und das neue Verfahrensrecht der Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenversicherungsgesetz, IVG)

This provision was used in the operative part to dismiss the appeal.

Art. 67 Abs. 1 des Bundesgesetzes über den Sitz in der Schweiz und das neue Verfahrensrecht der Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenversicherungsgesetz, IVG)

This provision was used in the operative part regarding the procedure for appeal against interlocutory decisions.

Art. 68 Abs. 4 des Bundesgesetzes über den Sitz in der Schweiz und das neue Verfahrensrecht der Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenversicherungsgesetz, IVG)

This provision was used in the operative part concerning the procedure for appeal against interlocutory decisions.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG)

This provision was applied in the operative part to rule on the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 19 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Ablehnung von Sachverständigen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: