Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2018 13 • VG SZ I 2018 13 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Appeal Timeliness via Email Challenge

Numero d'incarto I 2018 13
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant challenged a decision within the context of accident insurance by submitting their appeal via email, leading to the pre-hearing body rejecting the appeal as untimely and procedurally defective. The court reasoned that an appeal submission via email does not meet the statutory requirements for a timely and formal objection, which generally mandates a written form requiring a physical signature, thus upholding the rejection of the appeal based on procedural grounds.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Appeal Timeliness via Email Challenge: The court reasoned that an appeal submission via email does not meet the statutory requirements for a timely and formal objection, which generally mandates a written form requiring a physical signature, thus upholding the rejection of the appeal based on procedural grounds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
requisito della firma assicurazione infortuni obbligatoria censure procedurali motivi che possono invocarsi insinuazione del credito censure tardive
Generato dall'IA
I 2019 98
Claimant v. Insurer (Delay in Insurance Benefits and Documentation)
I 2023 14
Accident Insurance Causality Appeal
I 2019 39
Accident Insurance Causality Dispute Appeal
II 2020 13
Insurance Premium Reduction Application Timeliness Appeal
I 2021 56
Accident Insurance Causation Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 13 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (fristund formgerechte Einspracheerhebung; E-Mail-Einsprache) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: