Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2017 8 • VG SZ I 2017 8 Generato dall'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal Reaffirming Existing Medical Evaluation

Numero d'incarto I 2017 8
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance, challenging the required medical evaluation, after an earlier application for benefits was denied based on existing medical evidence. The court reasoned that since the claimant had not presented any new medical findings or pointed out specific factual errors in the previous expert opinions, the lower court was justified in upholding the existing determination that the claimant had not demonstrated a significant change in their medical condition warranting a reassessment of disability status.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal Reaffirming Existing Medical Evaluation: The court reasoned that since the claimant had not presented any new medical findings or pointed out specific factual errors in the previous expert opinions, the lower court was justified in upholding the existing determination that the claimant had not demonstrated a significant change in their medical condition warranting a reassessment of disability status.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione invalidità rivalutazione medica mezzi di prova medici perizia giudiziaria affezione nell'assicurazione militare rinascita della qualità d'assicurato Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 8 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Daniel Candrian, \n Weidhuobli 29, 6430 Schwyz, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: