Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2017 79 • VG SZ I 2017 79 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Denial of Disability Benefits for Chronic Pain

Numero d'incarto I 2017 79
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision denying them disability insurance benefits based on an assessment finding they possessed residual work capacity in the general labor market, despite suffering from chronic pain following an accident that necessitated extensive medical treatment. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the medical documentation, including expert opinions, did not establish a severe and long-lasting impairment of the claimant's physical or mental health that would preclude them from performing any gainful employment, thus affirming the lower administrative body's determination of residual capacity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 BGG; Claimant v. Denial of Disability Benefits for Chronic Pain: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the medical documentation, including expert opinions, did not establish a severe and long-lasting impairment of the claimant's physical or mental health that would preclude them from performing any gainful employment, thus affirming the lower administrative body's determination of residual capacity.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità perizia medica danno cronico alla salute assicurazione malattia accertamento della capacità lavorativa prestazioni dell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 BGG
The decision regarding the costs was based on this article.
Generato dall'IA
I 2019 76
Insurance Benefits Denial for Chronic Pain Syndrome
I 2023 2
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits for Chronic Symptoms
I 2022 69
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld
I 2021 75
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Despite Chronic Pain and Psychosocial Factors
I 2021 7
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Work-Limiting Impairment

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 BGG

The decision regarding the costs was based on this article.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 79 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. März 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: