Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2017 76 • VG SZ I 2017 76 Generato dall'IA

Pension Fund Benefit Reduction Notice Dispute

Numero d'incarto I 2017 76
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A plaintiff sought to enforce a claim for occupational pension benefits against a pension fund following the termination of employment, arguing that the required notice period for benefit reduction had not been observed. The court determined that the contractual agreement for the pension plan, which included a provision for benefit reduction upon termination, was valid and the statutory notice requirement for such a reduction, as stipulated in the relevant legislation, was indeed met, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's appeal against the rejection of their claim for full benefits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Pension Fund Benefit Reduction Notice Dispute: The court determined that the contractual agreement for the pension plan, which included a provision for benefit reduction upon termination, was valid and the statutory notice requirement for such a reduction, as stipulated in the relevant legislation, was indeed met, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's appeal against the rejection of their claim for full benefits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
soppressione della rendita riduzione delle prestazioni fondo pensionistico termine di disdetta prestazione di previdenza piano di ripartizione della previdenza professionale Berufliche Vorsorge | Berufliche Vorsorge (mit med. SV)
Generato dall'IA
I 2018 112
Occupational Pension Benefit Dispute
II 2020 40
Pension Deferral Notification Requirement Dispute
I 2016 83
Pension Fund Disability Benefit Calculation Dispute
II 2018 107
Pension Institution v. Employer: Recovery of Unpaid Pension Contributions
II 2019 91
Pension Fund v. Employer: Occupational Pension Contributions Dispute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 76 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. S.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ (Pensionskasse), \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Berufliche Vorsorge |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: