Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2017 73 • VG SZ I 2017 73 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration

Numero d'incarto I 2017 73
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioner, a claimant for disability insurance benefits, appealed a decision denying her disability pension, stemming from a work-related accident in 2011 that led to various physical ailments including severe neck and back problems, headaches, and psychological distress, where the administrative body concluded that the claimant retained significant earning capacity in the open labor market despite persistent pain and medical findings. The court, in affirming the prior decision, reasoned that the administrative body correctly evaluated the totality of the medical evidence and functional limitations, finding that the petitioner was still capable of gainful employment commensurate with her residual physical and psychological capacity, thus failing to meet the threshold for a full disability pension under the relevant insurance statutes.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration: The court, in affirming the prior decision, reasoned that the administrative body correctly evaluated the totality of the medical evidence and functional limitations, finding that the petitioner was still capable of gainful employment commensurate with her residual physical and psychological capacity, thus failing to meet the threshold for a full disability pension under the relevant insurance statutes.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione organo dell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni accertamento della capacità lavorativa attività lucrativa motivi medici Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 73 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. November 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n D._____, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Christian Haag, \n Schwanenplatz 7, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: