Appeal Regarding Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA party appealed a prior ruling concerning the validity and enforcement of an arbitration award, challenging the lower court's confirmation of the award. The court reasoned that the review of an arbitration award under the relevant procedural law is limited, focusing only on enumerated grounds for setting aside or refusing enforcement, and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate any such procedural defect or violation of public policy that would justify overturning the arbitral decision, thus upholding the lower court's confirmation of the award.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Regarding Confirmation of Arbitration Award: The court reasoned that the review of an arbitration award under the relevant procedural law is limited, focusing only on enumerated grounds for setting aside or refusing enforcement, and found that the appellant failed to demonstrate any such procedural defect or violation of public policy that would justify overturning the arbitral decision, thus upholding the lower court's confirmation of the award.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 61 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2017 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________ |\n \n\n
\n