Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2017 45 • VG SZ I 2017 45 Generato dall'IA

Insurance Benefits Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Work Capacity

Numero d'incarto I 2017 45
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought disability insurance benefits following a work-related accident resulting in an impaired ability to work, but the initial insurance provider denied the claim based on a specialist's opinion suggesting the claimant could still perform sedentary work, leading to an appeal. The court reviewed the medical documentation and expert findings, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision that the objective medical evidence did not sufficiently substantiate a degree of incapacity that warranted the continuation or granting of disability benefits beyond what had already been assessed, thereby upholding the denial based on the medical expert's assessment of residual capacity for work.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurance Benefits Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Work Capacity: The court reviewed the medical documentation and expert findings, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision that the objective medical evidence did not sufficiently substantiate a degree of incapacity that warranted the continuation or granting of disability benefits beyond what had already been assessed, thereby upholding the denial based on the medical expert's assessment of residual capacity for work.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazione dell'assicurazione invalidità capacità al lavoro mezzi di prova medici prestazioni dell'assicurazione infortuni diritto alla prestazione d'assicurazione valutazione dell'incapacità di lavoro Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Oktober 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n D.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. David Husmann, \n Alderstrasse 40, 8008 Zürich, Postfach, 8034 Zürich, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: