Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2017 4 • VG SZ I 2017 4 Generato dall'IA

Disability Pension Discontinuation Following Vocational Rehabilitation Review

Numero d'incarto I 2017 4
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance benefits, stemming from a previous vocational rehabilitation measure that the insurance office subsequently discontinued, leading to a review of the entitlement to a disability pension. The court reasoned that since the claimant had regained sufficient earning capacity after the conclusion of the rehabilitation program, which was the basis for the prior benefit decision, the administrative body was justified in reviewing and ultimately discontinuing the disability pension due to the non-occurrence of the prerequisites for its continued payment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Disability Pension Discontinuation Following Vocational Rehabilitation Review: The court reasoned that since the claimant had regained sufficient earning capacity after the conclusion of the rehabilitation program, which was the basis for the prior benefit decision, the administrative body was justified in reviewing and ultimately discontinuing the disability pension due to the non-occurrence of the prerequisites for its continued payment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riesame della rendita di invalidità riabilitazione professionale diritto alla rendita proseguimento dell'erogazione delle prestazioni prestazioni assicurative nuova domanda di prestazioni d'invalidità Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Prof.Dr.iur. Hardy Landolt, LL.M., \n Schweizerhofstrasse 14, Postfach 568, 8750 Glarus, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: