Denial of Invalidity Pension Pending Vocational Rehabilitation
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant appealed a decision denying them an invalidity insurance pension, stemming from an initial request filed in 2017. The court reasoned that although the appellant suffered from a permanent work incapacity exceeding fifty percent, the relevant medical reports indicated that the appellant had not yet maximized their possibilities for vocational rehabilitation, specifically concerning a necessary vocational change, and therefore, the claim for an invalidity pension was premature as the prerequisite for a permanent loss of earning capacity had not yet been fully established.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IADenial of Invalidity Pension Pending Vocational Rehabilitation: The court reasoned that although the appellant suffered from a permanent work incapacity exceeding fifty percent, the relevant medical reports indicated that the appellant had not yet maximized their possibilities for vocational rehabilitation, specifically concerning a necessary vocational change, and therefore, the claim for an invalidity pension was premature as the prerequisite for a permanent loss of earning capacity had not yet been fully established.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 23 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. August 2017 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: