Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant sought disability insurance benefits for a severe persistent visual impairment that began following an accident, arguing that the resulting limitation prevented substantial gainful employment, despite initial assessments finding no material impediment to the previous occupation. The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG, Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment: The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.
The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.
This procedural article is cited regarding the decision on the appeal concerning the award of an invalidity pension.
Costs are allocated based on this provision.
Testo completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 113 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. April 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Luca Barmettler, \n Bahnhofstrasse 8, 6403 Küssnacht, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: