Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2017 113 • VG SZ I 2017 113 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment

Numero d'incarto I 2017 113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant sought disability insurance benefits for a severe persistent visual impairment that began following an accident, arguing that the resulting limitation prevented substantial gainful employment, despite initial assessments finding no material impediment to the previous occupation. The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG, Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment: The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impatto visivo prestazioni dell'assicurazione invalidità pensione d'invalidità domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione assicurazione infortuni sul lavoro motivi medici Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) | Invalidenversicherung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG

The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.

Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.

Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG

This procedural article is cited regarding the decision on the appeal concerning the award of an invalidity pension.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are allocated based on this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 113 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Luca Barmettler, \n Bahnhofstrasse 8, 6403 Küssnacht, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: